Peer Review Process
Double-Blind Peer Review
The Journal of Emerging Intelligent Engineering Research and Technology (JEIERT) follows a double-blind peer review process in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential. This approach is intended to support fair, objective, and unbiased evaluation of submitted manuscripts. Each manuscript is normally evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the subject area of the submission.
Key Features of Our Review Process:
- Double-blind review to support fair and impartial evaluation
- A minimum of two independent reviewers for each manuscript, where appropriate
- Reviewers selected based on subject expertise and relevance to the manuscript
- Evaluation of originality, technical quality, methodology, significance, clarity, and relevance
- Constructive and scholarly feedback provided to authors
- Editorial decisions based on reviewer recommendations and overall manuscript quality
Benefits of Double-Blind Review
- Reduces potential bias related to author identity or institutional affiliation
- Keeps the evaluation focused on the quality, novelty, and scientific merit of the research
- Encourages fair and objective assessment
- Supports confidentiality throughout the review process
- Helps maintain high academic and publication standards